On 7 January 2013 07:29, Takeshi Yamamuro
<yamamuro(dot)takeshi(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:

> Anyway, the compression speed in lz4 is very fast, so in my
> opinion, there is a room to improve the current implementation
> in pg_lzcompress.

So why don't we use LZ4?

-- 
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

• Improve compression speeds in pg_lzcompress.c at 2013-01-07 07:29:58 from Takeshi Yamamuro

Responses

• Re: Improve compression speeds in pg_lzcompress.c at 2013-01-07 09:19:59 from John R Pierce
• Re: Improve compression speeds in pg_lzcompress.c at 2013-01-07 13:52:09 from ktm@rice.edu

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: John R Pierce	Date: 2013-01-07 09:19:59
	Subject: Re: Improve compression speeds in pg_lzcompress.c
Previous:	From: Shigeru Hanada	Date: 2013-01-07 09:07:39
	Subject: Re: PATCH: optimized DROP of multiple tables within a transaction