On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Maxim Boguk <maxim(dot)boguk(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> I know GIST on intarray do not have that problem.
>> Very likely the problem is limited to intarray GIN indexes only
>> (but I going to test some other not-well known GIN indexes tomorrow).
>> Broken FTS indexes on Hot Standby should be known years before.
> You might think that, but you'd be wrong :-(.
Yes, that did sound ominous.
> is failing to restore the contents of the pending-list correctly,
> which means this is broken for all types of GIN indexes. Will fix.
Great detective work Tom as ever, much appreciated.
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
In response to
pgsql-bugs by date
|Next:||From: Thomas Goerner||Date: 2011-11-28 12:26:26|
|Subject: Re: BUG #6308: Problem w. encoding in client|
|Previous:||From: Kevin Grittner||Date: 2011-11-27 17:32:56|
|Subject: Re: BUG #6311: Performance degradation after upgrade|