On 19 May 2012 14:00, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> What I'd suggest is that we keep only the SQL:2011 column. The
> differences from 2003 to 2011 aren't that great that it's very useful to
> analyze the differences, and 1999 and 1992 are really only of
> archeological interest.
The SQL:2011 standard replaces previous standards, so I agree: we
should only list the current version of the standard. The previous
versions of the standard are simply no longer relevant.
If people want that, we could have a little text at bottom saying
Changes between 2008 and 2011 etc.. if that really is interesting -
and if it really is then it should be listed as incompatibilities in
the release notes.
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
In response to
pgsql-docs by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2012-05-21 16:09:25|
|Subject: Re: ALTER TABLE ... CLUSTER ON synopsis |
|Previous:||From: Dan McGee||Date: 2012-05-21 10:11:34|
|Subject: Re: Observation on integer types documentation|