| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Nils Goroll <slink(at)schokola(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: spinlock->pthread_mutex : first results with Jeff's pgbench+plsql |
| Date: | 2012-07-02 15:42:05 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmobxZPiC1ejY4Z3EoiSD8B+FFcvGF_DF5JPXzATTq9BkaA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Nils Goroll <slink(at)schokola(dot)de> wrote:
>> 3.1.7?
>
> Sorry, that was a typo. 9.1.3.
>
> Yes, I had mentioned the Version in my initial posting. This version is the one
> I need to work on as long as 9.2 is beta.
>
>> A major scalability bottleneck caused by spinlock contention was fixed
>> in 9.2 - see commit b4fbe392f8ff6ff1a66b488eb7197eef9e1770a4. I'm not
>> sure that it's very meaningful to do performance testing on versions
>> that are known to be out of date.
>
> Apparently I have not pointed this out clearly enough. Sorry.
You might try back-porting that one commit and see whether it fixes
your problem.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Fetter | 2012-07-02 15:49:05 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make walsender more responsive. |
| Previous Message | Nils Goroll | 2012-07-02 15:38:08 | Re: spinlock->pthread_mutex : first results with Jeff's pgbench+plsql |