| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: redundant message? |
| Date: | 2012-08-06 19:08:38 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmobun6WOWbMYwPyASJvQesBuiERRMkge7Lt5nftxmJTyAw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> I noticed we have this message in utils/adt/misc.c:176 (9.2 branch):
>
> (errmsg("must be superuser or have the same role to terminate backends running in other server processes"))));
>
> I think the wording "backends running in other server processes" is
> redundant.
Yeah.
> How about this?
> (errmsg("must be superuser or have the same role to terminate other server processes"))));
Sounds good to me.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2012-08-06 21:25:20 | Re: spinlock->pthread_mutex : real world results |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2012-08-06 18:54:01 | redundant message? |