Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Inlining comparators as a performance optimisation

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Inlining comparators as a performance optimisation
Date: 2011-12-02 02:15:14
Message-ID: CA+TgmobsD4tF4P0+LfSeAboOxv5fasJJQ=GJdp=pAGU81tKv9w@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 8:13 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> What I want to see is some mechanism that pushes this out to the
> individual datatypes, so that both core and plug-in datatypes have
> access to the benefits.  There are a number of ways that could be
> attacked, but the most obvious one is to invent additional, optional
> support function(s) for btree opclasses.

I feel like what's missing here is a way for the catalogs to refer to
a function that doesn't take FunctionCallInfo as an argument.  But it
strikes me that it wouldn't be very hard to design such a mechanism.
It seems like all we really need to do is decide on a nomenclature.
The simplest possible approach would probably be to just refer to
functions by name.  In other words, we add a text or name column to
pg_amproc, and then inside the backend there's a function whose job it
is to map the string to a function address.  However, that would have
the annoying effect of causing catalog bloat, so I'm inclined to
instead propose an 8-byte integer.  (A 4-byte integer is enough, but
would increase the risk of collisions between values that might be
chosen by third party extensions.)

So, the API to this would look something like this:

void register_arbitrary_function_pointer(int64 handle, void *funcptr);
void *get_arbitrary_function_pointer(int64 handle);

So the idea is that if you need to refer to an arbitrary function in a
system catalog (such as pg_amproc), you generate a random non-zero
64-bit integer, stuff it into the catalog, and then register the same
64-bit integer with the appropriate function pointer.  To avoid
increasing backend startup time, we could have a Perl script generate
a prefab hash table for the built-in functions; loadable modules would
add their entries at PG_init() time using
register_arbitrary_function_pointer.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-12-02 02:16:58
Subject: Re: Why so few built-in range types?
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2011-12-02 02:09:55
Subject: Re: Command Triggers

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group