On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 12:02 PM, David E. Wheeler <david(at)justatheory(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mar 9, 2012, at 7:55 AM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
>> 100% agree (having re-read the thread and Alvaro's idea having sunk
>> in). Being able to set up daemon processes side by side with the
>> postmaster would fit the bill nicely. It's pretty interesting to
>> think of all the places you could go with it.
> pgAgent could use it *right now*. I keep forgetting to restart it after restarting PostgreSQL and finding after a day or so that no jobs have run.
That can and should be fixed by teaching pgAgent that failing to
connect to the server, or getting disconnected, is not a fatal error,
but a reason to sleep and retry.
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Andrew Dunstan||Date: 2012-03-09 18:51:37|
|Subject: Re: elegant and effective way for running jobs inside a
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2012-03-09 18:23:38|
|Subject: Re: xlog location arithmetic|