On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 7:20 AM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 2:32 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>>> I haven't looked through the code in detail, but one direct comment:
>>> do we really need/want to send this through the stats collector? It
>>> will only ever have one sender - perhaps we should just either store
>>> it in shared memory or store it locally and only send it on demand?
>> fyi, i intend to send a reworked patch later today, it will store the
>> info locally and send it on demand.
> are you planning to submit the updated version of the patch?
Hearing no response, I have marked this patch Returned with Feedback.
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2012-03-15 22:18:18|
|Subject: Re: logging in high performance systems.|
|Previous:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2012-03-15 22:14:12|
|Subject: Re: Faster compression, again|