Re: splitting *_desc routines

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: splitting *_desc routines
Date: 2012-10-27 02:18:54
Message-ID: CA+TgmobmW9rcYr7YCY5dqeCeA1tE7PZz+g5DiKYQS4Kq39urVw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 4:25 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> I'd put these in a separate directory to avoid annoyance. Transam is
> already too large.

+1. A further advantage of that is that it means that that everything
in that new directory will be intended to end up as
all-separately-compilable, which should make it easier to remember
what the rules are, and easier to design an automated framework that
continuously verifies that it still works that way.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 2012-10-27 05:01:50 Logical to physical page mapping
Previous Message Noah Misch 2012-10-26 22:32:33 Re: Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation