Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: 9.2 release schedule

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 9.2 release schedule
Date: 2012-07-23 14:12:19
Message-ID: CA+Tgmobgg1n5j_diHrLVtb8Jp9oOw8XgeDqhRbVhJ3TutoT8qw@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> It looks like the most optimistic schedule we could possibly make,
> assuming no show-stopper bugs are reported, is:
>
> * Wrap beta3 on August 2 for release Monday Aug 6
>
> * RC1 two weeks later (release Aug 20)
>
> * 9.2.0 two weeks after that (release Sept 3)
>
> Now that schedule isn't actually going to work so far as the USA
> contingent is concerned, because Sept 3 is Labor Day.  But we could
> figure that there's room for one week's slip in there, either for
> RC1 or final, giving us a release date of Sept 10.
>
> Again, this is assuming no major bugs are found to force more slippage
> or additional betas/RCs.  But I think it's reasonable to shoot for
> If All Goes Well.
>
> Comments, objections?

Seems OK, but I think we need to work a little harder on evicting some
things from the list of open items.  I don't think all of the things
listed in the blockers section really are, and I'm not sure what needs
to be done about some of the things that are there.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2012-07-23 14:17:39
Subject: Re: [PATCH] XLogReader v2
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2012-07-23 14:08:46
Subject: Re: Using pg_upgrade on log-shipping standby servers

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group