Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Deprecations in authentication

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Deprecations in authentication
Date: 2012-11-05 17:10:19
Message-ID: CA+TgmobgNMhr7vwK2F5wFkP6_Sx5E2VM2jbgq-UjXW2uTVVWFg@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> Magnus,
>
> * Magnus Hagander (magnus(at)hagander(dot)net) wrote:
>> I have no idea what platform that would be. Both the standard
>> implementations of krb5 have supported gssapi since forever. The only
>> nonstandard environment we support there is Windows, and that one *only*
>> has support for GSSAPI/SSPI.
>
> There are some older unixes that had their own Kerberos libraries,
> that's what I was specifically referring to.  I agree that there's
> really only 2 implementations among the major free/open source
> distributions and that those have supported GSSAPI for a long time.
>
>> Well, we can remove it and see if it breaks :)
>
> That was more-or-less what I was encouraging.. :D
>
> The only question there is if we're even building w/ krb5 and/or
> gssapi support on the buildfarm by default today..?

Well, looking at the BF:

http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_status.pl

...it seems there are LOTS of machines building with krb5, and NONE with gssapi.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2012-11-05 17:13:43
Subject: Re: Deprecations in authentication
Previous:From: Stephen FrostDate: 2012-11-05 14:57:23
Subject: Re: Deprecations in authentication

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group