| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp> |
| Subject: | Re: erroneous restore into pg_catalog schema |
| Date: | 2013-04-17 14:45:35 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmobb6iTFn-VigtwrbEG4u_cmrkN7YuGpRe1C8iyedb51xg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Alvaro Herrera
>>> Robert, are you working on this?
>
>> I wasn't, but I can, if we agree on it.
>
> I think we need to do *something* (and accordingly have added this to
> the 9.3 open items page so we don't forget about it). Whether Robert's
> idea is the best one probably depends in part on how clean the patch
> turns out to be.
The attached patch attempts to implement this. I discovered that, in
fact, we have a number of places in our initdb-time scripts that rely
on the current behavior, but they weren't hard to fix; and in fact I
think the extra verbosity is probably not a bad thing here.
See what you think.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| explicit-pg-catalog.patch | application/octet-stream | 19.5 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ants Aasma | 2013-04-17 14:47:55 | Re: Enabling Checksums |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2013-04-17 14:27:47 | Re: event trigger API documentation? |