Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Update on the spinlock->pthread_mutex patch experimental: replace s_lock spinlock code with pthread_mutex on linux

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Nils Goroll <slink(at)schokola(dot)de>
Cc: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Update on the spinlock->pthread_mutex patch experimental: replace s_lock spinlock code with pthread_mutex on linux
Date: 2012-07-01 18:25:57
Message-ID: CA+Tgmob_VuTcg=hKj8qAL5314ERG1M80c_vwSSrCS44fh_NOJw@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Nils Goroll <slink(at)schokola(dot)de> wrote:
>> test runs on an IBM POWER7 system with 16 cores, 64 hardware threads.
>
> Could you add the CPU Type / clock speed please?

cpu		: POWER7 (architected), altivec supported
clock		: 3550.000000MHz
revision	: 2.1 (pvr 003f 0201)

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2012-07-01 18:50:04
Subject: Re: new --maintenance-db options
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2012-07-01 18:25:25
Subject: Re: Update on the spinlock->pthread_mutex patch experimental: replace s_lock spinlock code with pthread_mutex on linux

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group