Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: clog double-dip in heap_hot_search_buffer

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: clog double-dip in heap_hot_search_buffer
Date: 2012-05-02 16:55:38
Message-ID: CA+TgmobURKR_EBj5imKRHfNNruJJmG2KnDSO3k7XruBs1aNHZg@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> Otherwise this seems like a good idea.
>
>> Do you think I should apply this to 9.2, or wait until 9.3?
>
> We're not at beta yet, and it seems pretty safe/self-contained, so
> I have no objection to committing now.

OK, done.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2012-05-02 17:06:53
Subject: Re: How hard would it be to support LIKE in return declaration of generic record function calls ?
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2012-05-02 16:55:17
Subject: Re: extending relations more efficiently

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group