Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: September 2012 commitfest

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: September 2012 commitfest
Date: 2012-10-11 19:30:00
Message-ID: CA+TgmobR-tr-JMPK7NOosHWcL-Hn-TkYK9RmaNzKD36xa5uxNw@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> I have a quietish few days starting on Saturday, will be looking at this
> then. Is it only the Windows aspect that needs reviewing? Are we more or
> less happy with the rest?

I think the Windows issues were the biggest thing, but I suspect there
may be a few other warts as well.  It's a lot of code, and it's
modifying pg_dump, which is an absolute guarantee that it's built on a
foundation made out of pure horse manure.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2012-10-11 19:33:55
Subject: Re: change in LOCK behavior
Previous:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2012-10-11 19:28:23
Subject: Deprecating RULES

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group