On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> I have a quietish few days starting on Saturday, will be looking at this
> then. Is it only the Windows aspect that needs reviewing? Are we more or
> less happy with the rest?
I think the Windows issues were the biggest thing, but I suspect there
may be a few other warts as well. It's a lot of code, and it's
modifying pg_dump, which is an absolute guarantee that it's built on a
foundation made out of pure horse manure.
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2012-10-11 19:33:55|
|Subject: Re: change in LOCK behavior|
|Previous:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2012-10-11 19:28:23|
|Subject: Deprecating RULES|