Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Timing overhead and Linux clock sources

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Ants Aasma <ants(dot)aasma(at)eesti(dot)ee>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Timing overhead and Linux clock sources
Date: 2012-08-28 14:43:07
Message-ID: CA+TgmobPiq5E+3b2sRT94BhuZTj2tpvf=CVnJ0tNk+U9JBNWKg@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 11:13 PM, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> After staring at all the examples I generated again, I think Bruce is right
> that the newer format he's suggesting is better.

OK by me, then.  If you're happy, I'm happy.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2012-08-28 14:47:28
Subject: Re: [v9.3] writable foreign tables
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2012-08-28 14:04:29
Subject: Re: MySQL search query is not executing in Postgres DB

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2013 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group