On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 10:58 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Yeah, that's about what it would take, but what I'm asking is why
> bother. The *only* case that we support here is turning a just-created,
> not-fooled-with table into a view, and I don't feel a need to promise
> that we will handle other cases (which are inevitably going to be poorly
> tested). See for example the adjacent relhassubclass test, which has
> got exactly the same issue.
>> One related thing that seems worth doing is ripping out relhaspkey,
> Having a hard time getting excited about that either ...
The fact that this code is poorly tested is exactly why I don't think
we should be complicating it with doodads of doubtful utility. The
existence of these Booleans causes people to use them. This probably
doesn't save any appreciable amount of performance, but it does make
it easier to write wrong code.
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
In response to
pgsql-bugs by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2011-09-15 11:26:00|
|Subject: Re: BUG #6193: The one-click installer failed to unpack|
|Previous:||From: Thomas Kellerer||Date: 2011-09-15 08:18:32|
|Subject: Re: Problem with the 9.1 one-click installer Windows7 64bit|