Re: Pg default's verbosity?

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Pg default's verbosity?
Date: 2012-07-05 00:36:06
Message-ID: CA+TgmobLjMMRNbD7+2BYoQDvFyj299TXKn+9bwEwnnxL+p90fQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 3:07 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>>> Personally, I'd have no problem with flat-out dropping (not demoting)
>>> both of those two specific messages. I seem to recall that Bruce has
>>> lobbied for them heavily in the past, though.
>>
>> I would like to see them gone or reduced as well. I think I wanted them
>> when we changed the fact that SERIAL doesn't create unique indexes, but
>> that was long ago --- I think everyone knows what happens now.
>
> Patch attached.

Committed.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2012-07-05 00:38:04 Re: Schema version management
Previous Message Robert Haas 2012-07-04 21:20:47 Re: Oracle porting sample instr function