Re: sortsupport for text

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: sortsupport for text
Date: 2012-10-08 15:30:59
Message-ID: CA+Tgmob=aSWvv2ONF9yOPNXPZaocaXB=mWQ-+T_vZ9Si0mhHRA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Do you think you can follow through on this soon, Robert? I don't
> believe that there are any outstanding issues. I'm not going to make
> an issue of the fact that strxfrm() hasn't been taken advantage of. If
> you could please post a new revision, with the suggested alterations
> (that you agree with), I'd be happy to take another look.

I don't have any plans to work on this further. I think all of the
criticism that has been leveled at this patch is 100% bogus, and I
greatly dislike the changes that have been proposed. That may not be
fair, but it's how I feel, and in light of that feeling it does not
make sense for me to pursue this. Sorry.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2012-10-08 15:39:17 Re: Add FET to Default and Europe.txt
Previous Message Kohei KaiGai 2012-10-08 15:30:41 Re: Move postgresql_fdw_validator into dblink