From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: psql \l to accept patterns |
Date: | 2013-01-11 16:28:20 |
Message-ID: | CA+Tgmob9UW0s_Rq_tyh9yRj1oyczf68CsTwCaekPwAjr-=XgzA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 17:37 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>> If we make the postgres database undroppable, unrenamable, and
>> strictly read-only, I will happily support a proposal to consider it a
>> system object. Until then, it's no more a system object than the
>> public schema - which, you will note, \dn has no compunctions about
>> displaying, even without S.
>
> Good point. What about the other suggestion about only displaying
> databases by default that you can connect to?
I would tend not to adopt that suggestion, on the grounds that it has
no obvious parallel with anything else psql hides by default.
However, I don't feel quite as strongly about that case.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2013-01-11 16:31:13 | Re: foreign key locks |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2013-01-11 16:28:01 | Re: ToDo: log plans of cancelled queries |