On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 8:30 AM, Nikhil Sontakke <nikkhils(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Yeah, I have already hacked it a bit. This constraint now needs to be
> spit out later as an ALTER command with ONLY attached to it
> appropriately. Earlier all CHECK constraints were generally emitted as
> part of the table definition itself.
Hrm. That doesn't seem so good. Maybe we've got the design wrong
here. It doesn't seem like we want to lose the ability to define
arbitrary constraints at table-creation time.
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2011-07-29 13:37:01|
|Subject: Re: Check constraints on partition parents only? |
|Previous:||From: Nikhil Sontakke||Date: 2011-07-29 12:30:27|
|Subject: Re: Check constraints on partition parents only?|