On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 7 December 2011 15:15, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> But it would still have to be prepared for detoasting,
>>> so in the end I was unenthused. Anyone who feels like testing could try
>>> to prove me wrong about it though.
>> I think that'd definitely be worth investigating (although I'm not
>> sure I have the time to do it myself any time real soon).
> I'll at least take a look at it. Sorting text is a fairly common case.
> I'm not hugely enthused about spending too much time on work that will
> only be useful if collate_is_c.
Well, text_pattern_ops is not exactly an uncommon case, but sure. And
there might be some benefit for other collations, too.
>> Cool. Peter, can you rebase your patch and integrate it into the
>> sortsupport framework that's now committed?
> Yes, I'd be happy to, though I don't think I'm going to be getting
> around to it this side of Friday. Since it isn't a blocker, I assume
> that's okay.
Sounds fine to me.
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Jaime Casanova||Date: 2011-12-07 16:22:41|
|Subject: Re: Measuring relation free space|
|Previous:||From: Peter Geoghegan||Date: 2011-12-07 15:58:03|
|Subject: Re: Inlining comparators as a performance optimisation|