Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: fstat vs. lseek

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: fstat vs. lseek
Date: 2011-10-28 19:40:51
Message-ID: CA+TgmoamXb9XLcGZvf=cG61+xbNhmDjzDmn4fq=u580A2hbUfw@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> The lseek patches just got included in Linus tree.

Excellent, thanks for the update!

http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git;a=commit;h=ef3d0fd27e90f67e35da516dafc1482c82939a60

So I guess this will be in Linux 3.2?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2011-10-28 19:47:13
Subject: Re: TOAST versus VACUUM, or "missing chunk number 0 for toast value" identified
Previous:From: Andres FreundDate: 2011-10-28 19:33:16
Subject: Re: fstat vs. lseek

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group