On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Alexander Korotkov
>> <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> I found that code of gistchoose doesn't follow it's logic. Idea of
>>> gistchoose is that first column penalty is more important than penalty of
>>> second column. If we meet same penalty values of first column then we choose
>>> minimal penalty value of second column among them.
>> Nice catch. Thanks for the patch, which I have now committed.
> Should we backpatch that?
Arguably, yes. Does the patch look sane to you?
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2012-08-30 17:42:55|
|Subject: Re: splitting *_desc routines|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2012-08-30 17:34:20|
|Subject: Re: HEAD crashes on windows when doing VACUUM ANALYZE|