Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Incorrect behaviour when using a GiST index on points

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Oleg Bartunov <obartunov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Incorrect behaviour when using a GiST index on points
Date: 2012-07-03 15:28:50
Message-ID: CA+TgmoafwqpO1_iNDLmUdn-j_HeunF_kzWy_1ricW7DoNjEmaA@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Alexander Korotkov
<aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Attached patch fixes GiST behaviour without altering operators behaviour.
>
>
> I think we definitely should apply this patch before 9.2 release, because it
> is a bug fix. Otherwise people will continue produce incorrect GiST indexes
> with in-core geometrical opclasses until 9.3. Patch is very simple and only
> changes few lines of code.
>
> Any thoughts?

Do we need to apply this patch to 9.2?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Kohei KaiGaiDate: 2012-07-03 15:33:09
Subject: Re: User-Id Tracking when Portal was started
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2012-07-03 15:21:31
Subject: TODO list updated for 9.3

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group