| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Christopher Manning <c(at)christophermanning(dot)org>, fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal to add --single-row to psql |
| Date: | 2013-05-11 15:17:03 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoaaELFkE-QBoktUNNgWhx1qnZ06VwCqxeLH7Hb+G8UqJw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 7:36 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Some of this is getting solved by making PostgreSQL more pluggable in
>> ways that isolate the proprietary stuff, i.e. make people not have to
>> touch the PostgreSQL core code much, if at all, in order to provide
>> whatever special features they provide. Hooks and FDWs are two such
>> pluggable components.
>
> Extensions and the lovely background workers as well.
Some kind of extendable parser would be awesome. It would need to tie
into the rewriter also.
No, I don't have a clue what the design looks like.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fabien COELHO | 2013-05-11 15:17:56 | Re: [PATCH] pgbench --throttle (submission 5) |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2013-05-11 07:45:52 | Re: corrupt pages detected by enabling checksums |