Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PATCH] Lazy hashaggregate when no aggregation is needed

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Ants Aasma <ants(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Jay Levitt <jay(dot)levitt(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Francois Deliege <fdeliege(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Lazy hashaggregate when no aggregation is needed
Date: 2012-07-02 14:33:58
Message-ID: CA+Tgmoa_meSYjvMXc_AA7jQz8ftKnoGY4N5EhxHNdycugusvqw@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Etsuro Fujita
<fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> Honestly, I'm not sure that it's worth including this, considering the use
> case...

Since nobody seems crazy about pursuing this, I'm marking this patch Rejected.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2012-07-02 14:34:34
Subject: Re: pgsql: Make walsender more responsive.
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2012-07-02 14:32:18
Subject: Re: Uh, I change my mind about commit_delay + commit_siblings (sort of)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2013 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group