Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Large number of open(2) calls with bulk INSERT into empty table

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Florian Weimer <fweimer(at)bfk(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Large number of open(2) calls with bulk INSERT into empty table
Date: 2012-08-20 19:19:59
Message-ID: CA+TgmoaJAH0_7=DO8nm2yUDZCqoSf6B=UdTz=1VZSChH667C=Q@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 9:05 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> A TODO for this?

You mean this part?

>> On the other hand, the problem of the FSM taking up 24kB for an 8kB
>> table seems clearly worth fixing, but I don't think I have the cycles
>> for it at present.  Maybe a TODO is in order.

I certainly think that'd be worth a TODO.  Whether the rest of this is
worth worrying about I'm not sure.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2012-08-20 19:22:04
Subject: Re: The pgrminclude problem
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2012-08-20 19:11:51
Subject: Re: Timing overhead and Linux clock sources

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group