On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 6:30 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> On 02/22/2012 04:29 PM, Marc Munro wrote:
>>> As the developer of veil I feel marginally qualified to bikeshed here:
>>> how about "silent"? A silent function being one that will not blab.
>> I also made this suggestion later in the day.
> SILENT isn't a bad idea. It seems to lead the mind in the right
> direction, or at least not encourage people to guess the wrong meaning.
TACITURN. UNLOQUACIOUS. TIGHTLIPPED. LACONIC.
OK, OK, I'm joking...
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2012-02-23 00:48:50|
|Subject: Re: [PATCH] typo fix|
|Previous:||From: Affan Salman||Date: 2012-02-23 00:26:43|
|Subject: Commit a445cb92 not tested without OpenSSL support?|