On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> Don't override arguments set via options with positional arguments.
>
> A number of utility programs were rather careless about paremeters
> that can be set via both an option argument and a positional
> argument. This leads to results which can violate the Principal
> Of Least Astonishment. These changes refuse to use positional
> arguments to override settings that have been made via positional
> arguments. The changes are backpatched to all live branches.
>
> Branch
> ------
> REL8_3_STABLE
Uh, isn't it kind of a bad idea to back-patch something like this? It
seems like a behavior change.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
In response to
Responses
pgsql-hackers by date
| Next: | From: Christopher Browne | Date: 2012-04-17 23:08:59 |
| Subject: Re: Bug tracker tool we need |
| Previous: | From: Andrew Dunstan | Date: 2012-04-17 22:39:10 |
| Subject: pgsql: Don't override arguments set via options with positionalargumen |
pgsql-committers by date
| Next: | From: Andrew Dunstan | Date: 2012-04-17 23:19:54 |
| Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Don't override arguments set via options
with positional argumen |
| Previous: | From: Andrew Dunstan | Date: 2012-04-17 22:39:10 |
| Subject: pgsql: Don't override arguments set via options with positionalargumen |