Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: removing =>(text, text) in 9.2

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: removing =>(text, text) in 9.2
Date: 2011-11-02 14:49:42
Message-ID: CA+Tgmoa8TkEwO8qNh0GLiUgNHsjFcn2e2L471e7mTr80KWgQSw@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 12:36 AM, David E. Wheeler <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> wrote:
> On Nov 1, 2011, at 11:19 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> Fair enough.
>>
>> So, I tried to work up a patch for this, but I'm actually a bit
>> confused about what needs to be done here.  I'll attach what I've got
>> so far as a starting point for discussion.
>
> Looks reasonable, if verbose. (Yes, the extension design currently requires that). What about doc updates?

Hmm, I was kind of expecting that to be wrong at least in some minor way.

Here's a new version with documentation updates.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Attachment: hstore-drop-arrow-v2.patch
Description: application/octet-stream (15.3 KB)

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Marti RaudseppDate: 2011-11-02 15:01:34
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Deferrable unique constraints vs join removal -- bug?
Previous:From: Eric RidgeDate: 2011-11-02 14:49:38
Subject: Re: Thoughts on "SELECT * EXCLUDING (...) FROM ..."?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group