From:
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To:
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc:
Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Oleg Bartunov <obartunov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject:
Re: Incorrect behaviour when using a GiST index on points
Date:
2012-07-03 15:44:13
Message-ID:
CA+Tgmoa-3s3YpeR8VhAPu1CeoWJKEsQeQA-HZ=F3yPxQMpsYMg@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat )
Thread:
2012-02-16 07:43:11 from Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
2012-02-20 08:44:29 from Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
2012-02-20 15:22:50 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2012-02-20 17:34:21 from Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
2012-02-22 13:56:03 from Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
2012-03-12 11:50:33 from Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
2012-04-09 08:52:12 from Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
2012-06-21 18:53:43 from Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
2012-07-03 15:28:50 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
2012-07-03 15:34:24 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2012-07-03 15:44:13 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
2012-07-03 15:48:41 from Oleg Bartunov <obartunov(at)gmail(dot)com>
2012-07-03 15:58:01 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2012-07-03 21:46:26 from Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
2012-10-23 14:18:48 from Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
2012-10-23 16:35:15 from Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
2012-08-27 22:43:56 from Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
2012-08-27 23:43:49 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2012-08-28 02:20:29 from Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
2012-08-28 02:21:27 from Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
2012-08-28 20:38:36 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
2012-08-28 21:04:09 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2012-08-29 03:08:45 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
2012-10-02 17:58:40 from Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
2012-10-11 11:17:28 from Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
2012-10-18 19:18:28 from Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
2012-11-02 12:05:30 from Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
2012-11-02 12:46:41 from Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
2012-11-02 17:01:17 from Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
2012-11-03 00:23:56 from Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
2012-11-03 21:53:19 from Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
2012-11-10 15:54:55 from Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
2013-02-08 23:32:53 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Lists:
pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Alexander Korotkov
>> <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> I think we definitely should apply this patch before 9.2 release, because it
>>> is a bug fix. Otherwise people will continue produce incorrect GiST indexes
>>> with in-core geometrical opclasses until 9.3. Patch is very simple and only
>>> changes few lines of code.
>>>
>>> Any thoughts?
>
>> Do we need to apply this patch to 9.2?
>
> It's been like that all along, no?
Yeah, but it seems an awful lot like a bug. In fact... it's hard to
imagine how it could be any more of a bug than this.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
In response to
Responses
pgsql-hackers by date
Next :From: Jan UrbańskiDate: 2012-07-03 15:45:14Subject : Re: plpython issue with Win64 (PG 9.2)Previous :From : Magnus HaganderDate : 2012-07-03 15:43:14Subject : Re: Posix Shared Mem patch
