Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Update docs on numeric storage requirements.

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <rhaas(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Update docs on numeric storage requirements.
Date: 2012-03-23 12:51:12
Message-ID: CA+Tgmoa+N3bMMWbupgwXOe4h5xbBPgRGbmNjG+DZC2njiPS3Ng@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committerspgsql-docs
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 10:36 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 9:21 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 4:41 AM, Robert Haas <rhaas(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
>>>> Update docs on numeric storage requirements.
>>>>
>>>> Since 9.1, the minimum overhead is three bytes, not five.
>>>
>>> Thanks for the commit!
>>>
>>> I think that it's worth backporting this to 9.1. Thought?
>>
>> I thought about it, but it didn't seem important enough to bother with.
>
> Yes, most v9.1 users would not bother that. But some actually did that.
> I reported this issue because I received the complaint from them. So I'm
> still thinking that it's worth backporting unless the backport needs
> unacceptable lots of effort.

Fine, I don't care that much.  I don't agree that every minor doc
correction needs to be back-patched, but neither do I want to argue
about it.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2012-03-27 03:16:39
Subject: Idea on indexes
Previous:From: Fujii MasaoDate: 2012-03-23 02:36:40
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Update docs on numeric storage requirements.

pgsql-committers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2012-03-23 14:55:52
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add notion of a "transform function" that can simplify function
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2012-03-23 12:50:32
Subject: pgsql: Update docs on numeric storage requirements.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group