On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 7:52 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> The other patches have clearer and specific roles without heuristics
>>> (mostly), so are at least viable for 9.2, though still requiring
>> I think we must also drop removebufmgrfreelist-v1 from consideration,
> I think you misidentify the patch. Earlier you said it that
> "buffreelistlock-reduction-v1 crapped
> out" and I already said that the assumption in the code clearly
> doesn't hold, implying the patch was dropped.
Argh. I am clearly having a senior moment here, a few years early.
So is it correct to say that both of the patches associated with
message attached to the following CommitFest entry are now off the
table for 9.2?
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Matthew Draper||Date: 2012-01-24 03:13:23|
|Subject: Re: Patch: Allow SQL-language functions to reference parameters
by parameter name|
|Previous:||From: Daniel Farina||Date: 2012-01-24 00:59:17|
|Subject: Re: Inline Extension|