Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: precision and scale functions for numeric

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: precision and scale functions for numeric
Date: 2012-04-30 18:19:44
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZzMbYUBEDftvp1OooRWppTDOv_swwusLaJfhj+pXpcRA@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> I didn't find a good way to find out how many digits a numeric value has
> or things like whether a numeric value is an integer.  (I had to go
> through bc(1) for the latter.)  Functions like precision() and scale()
> would have been quite handy.  Are there other ways to do this, or would
> this make a good addition?

I think you could test for integer-ness by testing whether val % 0 = 0.

You could in general test of digits after the decimal point by casting
the value to text and using POSITION() to find the decimal point.  If
POSITION() returns zero then zero; else subtract the result from the
string length.  Similarly, it's pretty easy to regexp away the
non-digits and measure the length of the resulting string.

I don't have a good feeling for whether these operations are common
enough to justify adding a few more functions.  They haven't yet come
up for me personally.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Merlin MoncureDate: 2012-04-30 18:33:26
Subject: Re: Future In-Core Replication
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2012-04-30 18:07:26
Subject: Re: Patch: add conversion from pg_wchar to multibyte

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group