Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: GIN over array of ENUMs

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: GIN over array of ENUMs
Date: 2013-01-14 16:52:54
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZyCktgzQfkHFSNkY_LETUt6AS4+UA5-bwOC4V=+twt+A@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca> wrote:
> I wish to create this data structure but GIN does not currently support an
> array of ENUM. Is intarray() a good place to look into adding ENUM support
> or is there already an operator class for working supports enums that I
> simply don't see at the moment.

What does intarray have to do with enums?

If you're talking about contrib/intarray, I suspect that's not a
particularly good place to do anything, except maybe rm -rf .

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2013-01-14 16:55:46
Subject: Re: erroneous restore into pg_catalog schema
Previous:From: Boszormenyi ZoltanDate: 2013-01-14 16:49:49
Subject: Re: pg_ctl idempotent option

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group