Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Online base backup from the hot-standby

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Steve Singer <ssinger_pg(at)sympatico(dot)ca>, Jun Ishiduka <ishizuka(dot)jun(at)po(dot)ntts(dot)co(dot)jp>, magnus(at)hagander(dot)net, heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, cedric(dot)villemain(dot)debian(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: Online base backup from the hot-standby
Date: 2012-01-23 13:13:51
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZvQ-zCp-aHohdcQ5EzqZpFu1P-6py3T=rEu7aipLgJmg@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 8:11 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 5:29 AM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> If many people think the patch is not acceptable without such a safeguard,
>> I will do that right now.
>
> That's my view.  I think we ought to resolve this issue before commit,
> especially since it seems unclear that we know how to fix it.

Actually, never mind.  On reading this more carefully, I'm not too
concerned about the possibility of people breaking it with pg_lesslog
or similar.  But it should be solid if you use only the functionality
built into core.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2012-01-23 13:16:14
Subject: Re: Removing freelist (was Re: Should I implement DROP INDEX CONCURRENTLY?)
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2012-01-23 13:11:10
Subject: Re: Online base backup from the hot-standby

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group