On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Naysayers can always make a case for backwards-compatibility, or not
> breaking the scripts written with the existing behaviour in mind.
I'm having a hard time imagining how this could break anything. What
scenario did you have in mind?
> Do our
> docs have anything to say about scripts executed from stdin?
If they do, we can always update them.
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2011-11-28 13:59:31|
|Subject: Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2011-11-28 13:51:15|
|Subject: Re: Patch: add timing of buffer I/O requests|