On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> * Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
>> Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
>> > I do like the idea of a generalized answer which just runs a
>> > user-provided command on the server but that's always going to require
>> > superuser privileges.
>> The design that was being kicked around allowed pipes to be used on the
>> client side too, ie \copy foo to '| gzip ...'. That form would not
>> require any special privileges, and might be thought preferable for
>> another reason too: it offloads the work from the server.
> It's a different use-case which, imv, is really already trivially
> psql -c 'COPY foo TO STDOUT;' | gzip > myfile.gz
> While there is no option currently for having the server do the
> compression before sending the data over the wire.
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2013-01-16 22:15:49|
|Subject: Re: [PATCH] COPY .. COMPRESSED|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2013-01-16 22:01:12|
|Subject: Re: CF3+4 (was Re: Parallel query execution)|