Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Request to add options to tools/git_changelog

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Request to add options to tools/git_changelog
Date: 2012-04-26 18:54:32
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZomQJSJTrShpWZG=n_WEL7LUaP+T_yHNtebozWSQXqyw@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
>> I agree adding rarely-used options to a tool doesn't make sense, but the
>> question is what percentage of the git_changelog userbase am I?
>
> 50% I think.  The only thing that's really concerning me here is that
> the reverse-sort option seems likely to be bug-inducing, and I really
> don't grasp that it has real value.  But whatever.

He can't be more than 33% I think, since I use it regularly as well.  :-)

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Jameison MartinDate: 2012-04-26 18:59:01
Subject: Re: patch submission: truncate trailing nulls from heap rows to reduce the size of the null bitmap
Previous:From: Jim NasbyDate: 2012-04-26 18:40:51
Subject: Re: Future In-Core Replication

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group