Re: [v9.2] sepgsql's DROP Permission checks

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>
Cc: PgHacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [v9.2] sepgsql's DROP Permission checks
Date: 2012-03-09 19:41:40
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZhWTiRP8Km3Bhz+k3jowMrpyebFnbbDG7rko0dMmS1hA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp> wrote:
> OK, I modified the patch according to your suggestions.
>
> object_access_hook was extended to take an argument of void * pointer,
> and InvokeObjectAccessHook was also allows to deliver it.

Sorry for the long radio silence on this patch. The changes to the
object-access hook stuff seem sound to me now, so I've gone ahead and
committed that part of this. I'll look at the rest next.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-03-09 19:47:31 Is it time for triage on the open patches?
Previous Message Robert Haas 2012-03-09 19:39:26 Re: xlog location arithmetic