On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp> wrote:
>>> I guess you concerned about that expected/select_views_1.out is
>>> patched, not expected/select_views.out.
>>> I'm not sure the reason why regression test script tries to make diff
>>> between results/select_views and expected/select_views_1.out.
>> select_views.out and select_views_1.out are alternate expected output
>> files. The regression tests pass if the actual output matches either
>> one. Thus, you have to patch both.
> It was new for me. The attached patch updates both of the expected
> files, however, I'm not certain whether select_view.out is suitable, or
> not, because my results/select_view.out matched with expected/select_view_1.out.
Committed. We'll see what the buildfarm thinks.
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2012-01-18 03:28:45|
|Subject: Re: [v9.2] LEAKPROOF attribute of FUNCTION (Re: [v9.2] Fix
Leaky View Problem)|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2012-01-18 02:53:02|
|Subject: Re: [v9.2] sepgsql's DROP Permission checks|