On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:35 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Numeric values are physically stored without any extra leading or
>> trailing zeroes. Thus, the declared precision and scale of a column
>> are maximums, not fixed allocations. (In this sense the numeric type
>> is more akin to varchar(n) than to char(n).) The actual storage
>> requirement is two bytes for each group of four decimal digits,
>> plus five to eight bytes overhead.
> The last sentence of the above seems not to be correct. Because,
> thanks to the reduction of NUMERIC size (committed in 9.1), its header
> size is three, five or eight for now. Attached patch fixes this.
Nice catch. Committed.
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
In response to
pgsql-docs by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2012-03-22 19:49:14|
|Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use idiomatic style for varlena structs|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2012-03-22 19:41:12|
|Subject: pgsql: Update docs on numeric storage requirements.|