Re: Compression of full-page-writes

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Compression of full-page-writes
Date: 2013-08-30 22:34:22
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZZbjA3Ht6iNXOBwjwdHo-3aGKd6oO1nFUM5mODE=-o+w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 10:55 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Attached patch adds new GUC parameter 'compress_backup_block'.

I think this is a great idea.

(This is not to disagree with any of the suggestions made on this
thread for further investigation, all of which I think I basically
agree with. But I just wanted to voice general support for the
general idea, regardless of what specifically we end up with.)

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2013-08-30 22:35:04 operator precedence issues
Previous Message Robert Haas 2013-08-30 22:30:16 Re: Window functions can be created with defaults, but they don't work