Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Progress on fast path sorting, btree index creation time

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Progress on fast path sorting, btree index creation time
Date: 2012-01-06 15:49:14
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZW=swH214ja0XB8y4DORzg2kK1jSZRTntFrwpxWdXgYQ@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> There is no compiler anywhere that implements "always inline", unless
> you are talking about a macro.  "inline" is a hint and nothing more,
> and if you think you can force it you are mistaken.  So this controversy
> is easily resolved: we do not need any such construct.

That's basically in direct contradiction to the experimental evidence.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2012-01-06 15:49:26
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix breakage from earlier plperl fix.
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2012-01-06 15:48:20
Subject: Re: CLOG contention

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group