Re: Speedup twophase transactions

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Nikhil Sontakke <nikhils(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Stas Kelvich <s(dot)kelvich(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Speedup twophase transactions
Date: 2017-02-03 22:17:41
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZDwKBB5ykkpXth9WyJJPWTUa4tF=nDcMseXBB42YeOJg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 3:29 AM, Nikhil Sontakke <nikhils(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Shouldn’t the singular part of the message above be:
>>> "%u two-phase state file was written for a long-running prepared transaction"
>>>
>>> But, then, English is not my native language, so I might be off here :-)
>>
>> If there's one file per long-running prepared transaction, which I
>> think is true, then I agree with you.
>
> PFA, small patch to fix this, then.

Committed.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Serge Rielau 2017-02-03 22:24:17 Re: Packages: Again
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-02-03 21:55:21 Re: pageinspect: Hash index support