Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Documentation mistake

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Cc: Vik Reykja <vikreykja(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Documentation mistake
Date: 2011-10-28 16:01:25
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZCU+QipMem=14am58iM+gjSGYo4MSahnUz4rFQnofamw@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Kevin Grittner
<Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> wrote:
> Vik Reykja <vikreykja(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> in Section 13.2.3 of the 9.1 docs [1], the follow sentence
>> fragment can be found:
>>
>> "using Serializable transactions will allow one transaction to
>> commit and and will roll the other back"
>>
>> Note the double "and" towards the end. (Is this the right list for
>> this kind of report?)
>
> When it's strictly documentation and doesn't involve questions of
> how the software works, pgsql-docs is probably better, but this
> works.
>
> Trivial patch attached.  Thanks!

Trivial commit performed.  Thanks.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-10-28 16:03:26
Subject: Re: out-of-order caution
Previous:From: Kevin GrittnerDate: 2011-10-28 15:59:06
Subject: Re: debug query execution

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group