Re: GSoC proposal - "make an unlogged table logged"

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Fabrízio Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: GSoC proposal - "make an unlogged table logged"
Date: 2014-03-03 16:37:30
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZ7xKY5QzB16WvjmEgNzC08kztxOD8p_QOQKio35uBfFQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello
<fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Is the TODO item "make an unlogged table logged" [1] a good GSoC project?

I'm pretty sure we found some problems in that design that we couldn't
figure out how to solve. I don't have a pointer to the relevant
-hackers discussion off-hand, but I think there was one.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2014-03-03 16:43:37 Re: GiST support for inet datatypes
Previous Message Robert Haas 2014-03-03 16:36:16 Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe