On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> I noticed the following object types don't have support for an ALTER ...
> RENAME command:
>
> DOMAIN (but ALTER TYPE works)
> FOREIGN DATA WRAPPER
> OPERATOR
> RULE
> SERVER
>
> Are there any restrictions why these couldn't be added?

I don't think so.  There's no ALTER RULE command; should we add one
(matching ALTER TRIGGER) or make this part of ALTER TABLE?  I don't
think constraints can be renamed either, which should probably be
addressed along with rules.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

• missing rename support at 2011-12-03 21:46:21 from Peter Eisentraut

Responses

• Re: missing rename support at 2011-12-05 15:54:31 from Tom Lane

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2011-12-05 15:46:57
	Subject: Re: cannot read pg_class without having selected a database / is this a bug?
Previous:	From: Robert Haas	Date: 2011-12-05 15:35:37
	Subject: Re: cannot read pg_class without having selected a database / is this a bug?