Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Displaying accumulated autovacuum cost

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Displaying accumulated autovacuum cost
Date: 2012-02-23 01:36:08
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYy3PeU87+41S6oYbA6pa2dKJyMDf+CXRmN7q103v+ruA@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:55 PM, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> I just took this for spin.  Everything I tried worked, docs built and read
> fine.  The description of how "dirty" differs from "written" is a bit
> cryptic, but I don't see an easy way to do better without a whole new
> section on that topic.  Once the extension upgrade questions are sorted out,
> I'd say this is ready to commit.  Example I have at the bottom here shows a
> case where this is a big improvement over the existing tracking.  I think
> this is a must-have improvement if we're going to advocate using
> pg_stat_statements for more things.

Glad you like it; committed.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2012-02-23 01:39:54
Subject: Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2012-02-23 00:48:50
Subject: Re: [PATCH] typo fix

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group